Skip to content
Pharmaceutical Guideline
General

Policy Regarding N-acetyl-L-cysteine

Guidance for Industry: Policy Regarding N-acetyl-L-cysteine, The New Guidance Document by USFDA (United States Food and Drug Administration)

Pharmaceutical Guideline1 min read
Share
FDA logo in large blue letters with U.S. Food and Drug Administration written in orange below

The New Guidance Document is Issued by USFDA

Guidance for Industry: Policy Regarding N-acetyl-L-cysteine

FDA logo in large blue letters with U.S. Food and Drug Administration written in orange below

Docket Number:FDA-2022-D-0490

Issued by: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

The purpose of this guidance is to advise dietary supplement manufacturers, distributors, and other stakeholders of our intent to exercise enforcement discretion with respect to the sale and distribution of certain products that contain N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) and are labeled as dietary supplements. As described below, the enforcement discretion policy applies to products that would be lawfully marketed dietary supplements if NAC were not excluded from the definition of “dietary supplement” and that are not otherwise in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way, unless specifically incorporated into a contract. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law. FDA guidance documents, including this guidance, should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in FDA guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

Get new articles

Practical GMP, QA and regulatory guidance for students and professionals, plus pharma job openings as they are posted. Free, about one email a week.

One email a week with the new articles. We email a confirmation link first, and every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy page.

General

Deadline Dilemma: The Case for Extending Revised Schedule M to December 2026

As of January 2026, the Indian pharma sector faces a massive bottleneck: over 13,000 plants require inspection, yet only ~1,100 field inspectors are active. While the government has enforced Revised Schedule M, Laghu Udhyog Bharti is pushing for a vital extension until December 2026 to prevent the closure of thousands of MSMEs and ensure the continued supply of affordable medicine.